Friday, June 10, 2005
"My God, doctor. This is unbelievable!"
Good to know that we, in the West, don't have a monopoly on crazy academics. Read this exchange between Egyptian historian Professor Zaynab Abd Al-Aziz and a host on Saudi Iqra TV:
I should start a competition about how many crazy conspiracy theories you can count in the good professor's interview. My favorite, though, undoubtedly has to be the one about the World Council of Churches delegating the mission of Christianizing of the world to the United States. I remember in the good old days of the Cold War, the WCC was one of those organizations that the Soviet Union could always count on to come out and slam America and the West on this or that issue, mostly nuclear disarmament (of the US, not the Soviets). Hence, I always thought that the WCC was primarily another one of those soft-left international lobbies rather than a hard-core missionary body hell-bent (or, rather, heaven-bent) on converting the world. Now, thanks to professor Al-Aziz, I stand corrected.
Reading this interview, one no longer wonders while much of the world has such a twisted image of the United States. It is also interesting to note how much overlap there is between the Islamofascist and hard left critique of America and its foreign policy. Home-grown lefties might not talk too much about those 4,000 Jews who caught the flu on September 11 (that's because, as far as the leftoids are concerned, instead of working at the WTC, all the Jews were already too busy controlling America's foreign policy in Washington DC), but there is a strong agreement on many other points. No wonder that Gorgeous George Galloway is now openly calling for the Red-Green alliance (hat tip: Tim Blair):
|
Abd Al-Aziz: "The decision to impose one religion over the entire world was made in the Second Vatican Council in 1965.""My God, doctor. This is unbelievable!" and "By God, you crack me up!" happen to be my reaction, too (although I can't say that I'm laughing). Professor Abd Al-Aziz might have been a consultant on the recent German public TV production which presented pretty much the same thesis, minus the "Christianizing the world" angle.
Host: "Huh?"...
Abd Al-Aziz: "Yes. The decisions of the 1965 Vatican Council included, first of all, absolving the Jews of the blood of Christ. This decision is well known and was the basis for the recognition of the occupying Zionist entity - Israel. The second decision was to eradicate the left in the eighties. I believe we've all witnessed this. The third decision was to eradicate Islam, so that the world would be Christianized by the third millennium."
Host: "Why is America hostile to Islam, although we never had and never will have the same conflict with them we had with Europe?"
Abd Al-Aziz: "Well, do you remember what we just said about the Second Vatican Council in 1965 and about Christianizing the world? It was agreed upon and pre-arranged. John Paul II prepared a five-year plan, on the eve of the third millennium, Christianize the world. His address in 1995 was based on the assumption that by the year 2000, the entire world would be Christianized. Since the plan was not accomplished, the World Council of Churches assigned this mission to the US in January 2001, since the US is the world's unrivaled military power. They named the decade between 2001-2010 "the age of eradicating evil" - "evil" referring to Islam and Muslims.
"The Crusader war is ongoing, because it has been a religious war since the dawn of Islam. Later, colonialism, missionaries, and Christianization were introduced. The Crusader war is ongoing. The Inquisition courts exist to this day. As I told you, the pope who was appointed a few days ago, headed the Inquisition Court, which is now called the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
"When in January 2001, the World Council of Churches delegated this mission to the US - what did the US do? It fabricated the show of is it September 9 or 11?"
Host: "11. Please explain this to me."
Abd Al-Aziz: "Yes, of course..."
Host: "You mean to say that the World Council of Churches delegated the mission of Christianizing of the world to the US."
Abd Al-Aziz: "Yes. And how could the US win legitimacy for this without anyone saying that they are perpetrating massacres and waging a Crusader war? It fabricated the 9/11 show. I call it a fabrication because much has been written on this. We are also to blame. Why do we accept a single perspective? Countless books were written, some of which were even translated into Arabic, like Thierry Meyssan's 9/11 - The Appalling Fraud and Pentagate. "Pentagate" like Watergate... He brings documents to prove that the method used in destroying the three (sic) towers was "controlled demolition.
"This is an architectural engineering theory, which was invented by the Americans. They teach it in their universities. They make movies and documentaries about it. They incorporated it in movie scenarios and then carried it out in real life. Why do we accept this?"
Host: "My God, doctor. This is unbelievable! You're saying that this destruction... "
Abd Al-Aziz: "...was a controlled demolition. The building collapsed in its place, without hitting a single building to its left or right. The three towers fell in place."
Host: "In the same method they use in movies and plays?"
Abd Al-Aziz: "Yes, Exactly like that. That is how the US won international legitimacy. You could sense the (9/11) operation was pre-planned because many things were revealed in the days that followed. For example 4,000 Jews caught influenza on that exact day. They set a timer, and all 4,000..."
Host: "By God, you crack me up! They all set a timer and got influenza on the same day. So the building was completely empty of Jews."
Abd Al-Aziz: "Much has been written about this. 150 Congressmen demanded an inquiry."
I should start a competition about how many crazy conspiracy theories you can count in the good professor's interview. My favorite, though, undoubtedly has to be the one about the World Council of Churches delegating the mission of Christianizing of the world to the United States. I remember in the good old days of the Cold War, the WCC was one of those organizations that the Soviet Union could always count on to come out and slam America and the West on this or that issue, mostly nuclear disarmament (of the US, not the Soviets). Hence, I always thought that the WCC was primarily another one of those soft-left international lobbies rather than a hard-core missionary body hell-bent (or, rather, heaven-bent) on converting the world. Now, thanks to professor Al-Aziz, I stand corrected.
Reading this interview, one no longer wonders while much of the world has such a twisted image of the United States. It is also interesting to note how much overlap there is between the Islamofascist and hard left critique of America and its foreign policy. Home-grown lefties might not talk too much about those 4,000 Jews who caught the flu on September 11 (that's because, as far as the leftoids are concerned, instead of working at the WTC, all the Jews were already too busy controlling America's foreign policy in Washington DC), but there is a strong agreement on many other points. No wonder that Gorgeous George Galloway is now openly calling for the Red-Green alliance (hat tip: Tim Blair):
Mohammad Basirul Haq Sinha: "You often call for uniting Muslim and progressive forces globally. How far is it possible under current situation?"Speaking of GGG, British journo Johann Hari has 15 questions for his supporters.
George Galloway: "Not only do I think it's possible but I think it is vitally necessary and I think it is happening already. It is possible because the progressive movement around the world and the Muslims have the same enemies. Their enemies are the Zionist occupation, American occupation, British occupation of poor countries mainly Muslim countries. They have the same interest in opposing savage capitalist globalization which is intent upon homogenizing the entire world turning us basically into factory chickens which can be forced fed the American diet of everything from food to Coca-Cola to movies and TV culture. And whose only role in life is to consume the things produced endlessly by the multinational corporations. And the progressive organizations & movements agree on that with the Muslims.
"Otherwise we believe that we should all have to speak as Texan and eat McDonalds and be ruled by Bush and Blair. So on the very grave big issues of the day - issues of war, occupation, justice, opposition to globalization - the Muslims and the progressives are on the same side."
|
